From Jim O'Brien
January 08, 2010
Hi Friend, The Real Jesus I don’t know exactly when it
was that I looked at the picture behind the preacher on Sunday morning and said
to myself “That picture is a fake!” but I do remember saying it in Sunday
School class. It didn’t earn any gold stars. Maybe it was after reading
Paul’s statement that “nature itself teaches you that long hair on a man is a
disgrace.” (1 Cor. Nor was he handsome. In fact
Isaiah’s description of the Messiah says “there was nothing attractive about
him, nothing that would draw us to him.” (Isaiah 53:2 GNB) It could have been when I
first realized that any man who had grown up working in construction during the
1st Century A.D. would of necessity be a brawny guy. The picture
just didn’t look very tough. The picture on the wall did
not look like the Christ who will return to the earth to make war described in
Revelation 19:11-16. “And I saw heaven opened,
and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him was called Faithful and
True, and in righteousness he doth judge and make war. His eyes were as a flame of
fire, and on his head were many crowns… And the armies which were in
heaven followed him upon white horses… And out of his mouth goeth a
sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall rule them
with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath
of Almighty God. And he hath on his vesture
and on his thigh a name written, KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS.” The typical picture of Jesus
often overlooks the account of Jesus throwing out the moneychangers from the
temple. (Matt. 21:12) How many moneychangers where there? The Bible doesn’t
say. But it was a large area so one could reasonably expect it to be several,
maybe a score or more. No wimpy man could physically throw out that many men
and turn over their means of doing business. That was my kind of guy. There is the Jesus that
painted a verbal picture of carnality and said “for after all these things do
the Gentiles seek.” (Matt. It’s also the kind of
statement that makes me think something has been lost from mainstream
Christianity. The other day some news
analysts were discussing the recent revelation of the sins of Tiger Woods, the
golf phenom. It’s hard to pass a check out counter at the super market without
reading about his loss of income and speculation about an impending divorce. So
someone asked if Tiger can make an emotional recovery from the sins of the
past. Brit Hume replied: "The extent to which he
can recover, it seems to me, depends on his faith. He is said to be a Buddhist.
I don't think that faith offers the kind of forgiveness and redemption that is
offered by the Christian faith. So, my message to Tiger would be, 'Tiger, turn
to the Christian faith and you can make a total recovery and be a great example
to the world." The reaction to Hume’s
statement was predictable. A writer for the Washington Post demanded that Hume
apologize because he had offended about half a billion Buddhists. Funny, there
are over two billion Christians on the earth and multiple thousands being
persecuted, some martyred almost on a daily basis around the world by
Buddhists, Hindi’s and Muslims yet the American press seems strangely
unconcerned about the offense caused to Christians. Maybe the reason is that
mainstream Christians resemble more the picture on the wall at the front of
church than they do the man who stood alone against a mob intent on stoning a
woman taken in adultery. Maybe Christianity needs an
infusion of the real Jesus, not the picture on the wall. Until next time,